A
Cratus Premium Restaurant & Lounge
looks legit · 4.81★, holds up
F
Burger & Coffee House
manipulation detected · 4.88★ claimed → 4.67★ adjusted
A+
Ferize Local Restaurant
looks legit · 4.69★ claimed → 4.87★ adjusted
A
SERİN CAFE RESTAURANT & Göreme kahvaltı(breakfest) salonu Desti kebabı GÖZLEME Kapadokya yöresel yemekleri
looks legit · 4.87★ claimed → 4.75★ adjusted
F
Cappadocia Balloon Cafe
manipulation detected · 4.71★ claimed → 4.15★ adjusted
D
OLD CAPPADOCIA CAFE
manipulation detected · 4.71★ claimed → 4.38★ adjusted
B
Ankara Sofrası Göreme
inflated rating · 4.57★ claimed → 4.36★ adjusted
B
NANA CAPPADOCIA - Restaurant & Rooftop Bar
we're not sure · 4.86★ claimed → 4.67★ adjusted
A
Cava Restaurant
looks legit · 4.91★, holds up
C
Sky Cappadocia Rooftop & Restaurant
possible manipulation · 4.73★ claimed → 4.49★ adjusted
B
Mommy's Kitchen Teras
inflated rating · 4.84★ claimed → 4.56★ adjusted
B
Kebab World Cappadocia
inflated rating · 4.79★ claimed → 4.54★ adjusted
D
Lilith Restaurant
manipulation detected · 4.82★ claimed → 4.72★ adjusted
A
Termessos Terrace Cafe
looks legit · 4.88★ claimed → 4.73★ adjusted
A
Taste of Moms
looks legit · 4.85★, holds up
A
Uzundere Kapadokya Mutfağı --Uzundere Cappadocia Cuisine--
looks legit · 4.78★, holds up
A
Badem Restaurant
looks legit · 4.95★, holds up
C
SOVİ CAPPADOCİA
possible manipulation · 4.85★
A
Seki Restaurant & Lounge
looks legit · 4.44★, holds up
A
Nahita Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.59★, holds up
C
Millocal Restaurant Kapadokya
possible manipulation · 4.37★ claimed → 4.21★ adjusted
A
House Of Memories - Bayramın yeri
looks legit · 4.75★, holds up
A
Montana Cafe & Restaurant
looks legit · 4.41★ claimed → 4.29★ adjusted
A
Dream Spot Cappadocia Restaurant
looks legit · 4.57★, holds up
F
Fırın Express Uçhisar
manipulation detected · 4.71★ claimed → 4.33★ adjusted
A
Paprika
looks legit · 4.83★, holds up
C
Bbq House Restaurant
possible manipulation · 4.85★ claimed → 4.72★ adjusted
B
Behç-Et Cappadocia Taş Kavurma & Meze
we're not sure · 4.90★ claimed → 4.72★ adjusted
A
Wood Mood Cappadocia Restaurant & Bistro
looks legit · 4.83★ claimed → 4.71★ adjusted
D
Seyr-i Sefa Cappadocia
manipulation detected · 4.91★ claimed → 4.78★ adjusted
A+
Le Mouton Rouge
looks legit · 4.53★, holds up
A
Elai Bistrot
looks legit · 4.77★, holds up
B
Wish Terrace
inflated rating · 4.68★ claimed → 4.35★ adjusted
A
Sunset Wine Garden Uçhisar
looks legit · 4.77★ claimed → 4.64★ adjusted
D
Luuk Restoran
manipulation detected · 4.39★ claimed → 4.11★ adjusted
B
Mill Italy Restaurant
inflated rating · 4.85★ claimed → 4.61★ adjusted
C
Karlık Teras cafe
inflated rating · 4.66★ claimed → 4.30★ adjusted
A
Zaru Asian Food
looks legit · 4.93★, holds up
A
Cappadocia Senza Restaurant
looks legit · 4.61★, holds up
A
Moniq Restaurant & Cocktail Bar
looks legit · 4.63★ claimed → 4.46★ adjusted
A+
Köftedokya Ortahisar
looks legit · 4.99★, holds up
B
Gündoğumu Cafe Restaurant
we're not sure · 4.95★ claimed → 4.76★ adjusted
A+
Fresko Restaurant
looks legit · 4.20★, holds up
A
Ortahisar kalesi restorant ve sarhoşun yeri
looks legit · 4.71★, holds up
A+
No.10 Restaurant Lounge
looks legit · 4.09★, holds up
A+
La Reina Restaurant & Lounge Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.74★, holds up
B
Kemeralti Restaurant
past manipulation · 4.81★ claimed → 4.63★ adjusted
A
Park Cafe Ali'nin Yeri
looks legit · 4.87★ claimed → 4.72★ adjusted
C
Yiğit Cafe & Restorant
possible manipulation · 4.93★
A+
Hezen Restaurant
looks legit · 4.92★, holds up
A
Janus Cappadocia Restaurant
looks legit · 4.92★, holds up
C
Hisarönü Restaurant
inflated rating · 4.68★ claimed → 4.48★ adjusted
A
Uğurlu Restoran
looks legit · 4.85★ claimed → 4.70★ adjusted
A
Narin Restaurant Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.84★, holds up
A+
Utopia Cave Cappadocia Hotel
looks legit · 4.61★, holds up
A+
Zeppelin Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.77★, holds up
A+
Via Regia Hotel Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.82★, holds up
A
The Rupestral House
looks legit · 4.84★, holds up
A+
Petra Inn Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.93★, holds up
A
Millstone Cave Suites
looks legit · 4.73★, holds up
A
Karlik Evi Boutique Hotel Uchisar
looks legit · 4.79★, holds up
A
Cappadocia Cave Resort & Spa
looks legit · 4.05★ claimed → 3.93★ adjusted
A
Breeze Of Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.86★ claimed → 4.71★ adjusted
A
Karlık Cave Suite
looks legit · 4.89★, holds up
A+
Woox Cappadocia Hotel
looks legit · 4.83★, holds up
B
Vasil Cave Hotel
we're not sure · 4.97★
D
Uçhisar Kaya Otel
manipulation detected · 4.45★ claimed → 4.28★ adjusted
A
Sakli Konak
looks legit · 4.62★, holds up
A
Pinhan Suites
looks legit · 4.83★ claimed → 4.70★ adjusted
A
Maze of Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.78★, holds up
A
Maya Cave Hotel
looks legit · 4.86★ claimed → 4.70★ adjusted
A+
Les Maisons de Cappadoce
looks legit · 4.59★, holds up
A
LA VIE CAPPADOCİA CAVE HOTEL
looks legit · 4.72★, holds up
A+
Karma Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.91★, holds up
A
Kappadoks Cave Hotel
looks legit · 4.96★, holds up
A
Juno Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.95★, holds up
B
IKARUS CAPPADOCİA HOTEL
we're not sure · 4.99★
A
Duven Hotel Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.65★, holds up
C
Castellum Cave Cappadocia
possible manipulation · 4.85★ claimed → 5.00★ adjusted
A
DAS 1350
looks legit · 4.84★, holds up
D
Capiedra Hotel
manipulation detected · 4.92★
A
Caldera Hotel
looks legit · 4.48★, holds up
A
Elika Cave Suites Cappadocia, Curio Collection by Hilton
looks legit · 4.39★, holds up
A
Yunak Evleri
looks legit · 4.48★, holds up
A+
Kayakapi Premium Caves - Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.70★ claimed → 4.81★ adjusted
A
Argos in Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.74★, holds up
A
Museum Hotel
looks legit · 4.51★, holds up
A
Rox Cappadocia, Tekelli, Kesek Sokak, Uçhisar/Nevşehir Merkez/Nevşehir, Türkiye
looks legit · 4.54★, holds up
A+
Taskonaklar Hotel Cappadocia
looks legit · 4.75★, holds up
A+
Kelebek Cave Hotel
looks legit · 4.77★, holds up

how it works

1. your agent collects the reviews

It opens the listing in its own browser, sorts by newest and collects them: all of them, or the 500 most recent at a big listing. We don't scrape Google.

2. we run the stats

Burst days, throwaway accounts, cross-posted text, solicited reviews, rating drift. Statistics, not vibes.

3. you get a grade

A to F, plus the rating credible reviewers actually give, with the evidence one click away. The place then appears here for everyone.

Google usually asks the browser to be signed in before it will sort or load more reviews. The agent reads Maps through your signed-in browser, much like scrolling the listing yourself. Heavy use could trip Google's rate limits; if you plan to check many places, a secondary Google account is a sensible choice.

No agent? Scripts can POST the same review JSON to /api/submissions; the format is at /api/sources/google-maps. Everything required is visible on the review card; review ids and exact timestamps are optional. Results from a single unconfirmed submitter are labeled as such until a second source agrees.

methodology

what signals do we look for?

We read a place's full review history and weigh the signals that are costly for a review farm to fake:

  • Burst campaigns: clusters of 5 star reviews dumped on a single day by low-history accounts. A genuine surge keeps a place's normal share of Local Guides, so it isn't counted against it.
  • Drip-feed farms: reviews arriving nearly every day at a pace no organic business sustains, a paid stream spread thin to dodge obvious spikes.
  • Cross-posted text: the same review copied word-for-word onto other businesses, a farm seeding a whole chain.
  • Throwaway accounts: single-review profiles padding the average up.
  • Review solicitation: reviewers themselves reporting that the business rewards, pressures, or steers reviews (“free dessert if you leave 5 stars”). An LLM reads every such mention; only firsthand reports of policy-violating practices count, and the penalty deepens with each independent witness. Politely asking for a review is allowed by Google and never counted.
  • Too-perfect records: a spotless, unanimous 5 star history often signals curated or incentivized reviews, so it can't earn a top grade, even when we can't prove fraud.
what's the “adjusted rating”?

What hard-to-fake reviewers actually give, vs the headline number. A gap means the rating is inflated. Two groups qualify:

  • Credible reviewers are Local Guides who also wrote a substantive review. The badge alone is gameable (farms run Local Guide accounts that drop bare 5 star ratings), so we only count ones that put real words behind the stars.
  • Established accounts have 30+ lifetime reviews, regardless of badge or text. Farms pad accounts with a handful of reviews to look plausible, but aging thousands of accounts past 30 is the expensive part.

Each place is anchored to whichever group gives the more conservative rating. When a place corrects the headline number, the “per credible reviewers” / “per established accounts” label tells you which.

where does the review data come from?

From the agents and scripts that submit it. Every submission is checked for structure and consistency (Google's own review and profile ids, timestamps against displayed dates, the rating average against the displayed rating, the count against the listed count, overlap with what we already hold), and a place submitted by one unconfirmed source carries an unverified source note until a second, independent submission agrees. Places we pulled ourselves before October 2026 need no such note.

what does a high score mean?

It means we found no evidence the business is manipulating or inflating its own reviews. It does not promise the rating is accurate: a clean place can still be mis-rated by too few reviews, reviewers who self-select, or honest reviews that just don't match your experience. We measure whether the number looks gamed, not whether it's right.